Hi Albert, On 07/18/2011 02:39 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Le 18/07/2011 04:52, Hong Xu a écrit : > > Hi Reinhard, > > > > It's a pity to see that some of the AT91 boards are planed to be removed > > by Wolfgang. > > > > Several weeks ago, the patches for SAM9261/9G10 have got Acks from you. > > See http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg54829.html > > But I don't know why it's not merged upstream. > > > > For SAM9RL, the V3 patches have been sent long time ago and was pinged. > > But no response any longer. > > > > The similar stories are also applied for SAM9263 and SAM9M10G45. > > > > We of course need the mainline support for all SAM9 boards in U-Boot. > > But it's the time we need your plans/suggestions/NAKs/ACKs to move on. > > > > Thanks. > > Note: I'll naturally defer the decision of what to make with the AT91 > boards to Reinhard, and likewise to other ARM custodians for boards the > architecture of which falls under their 'jurisdiction'.
Understand. But it looks like Reinhard has bunch of paid work at hand and he has his vocation in the near future (He mentioned this in an email towards Wolfgang's [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/52] ARM: remove broken boards). We noticed that there are several AT91 fixes in the mailing list without any response. As a suggestion, how about we setup a git branch and collect AT91 related patches during Reinhard's busy time and vocation time? If yes, can we ask for `pull request' from you? Thanks. BR, Eric _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
