Dear Graeme Russ, In message <4e215370.2090...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > I'm not sure patchwork is supposed to honor the in-reply between patch > > versions. BTBW, is there a rationale or other documentation on the behavior > > of patchwork somewhere? > > I should! - The whole point of me painstakingly getting the in-reply-to > correct for each individual patch was so they would track correctly > everywhere (inbox, list archive, patchwork). Oh Well
As far as I understand the threading is only given in the mailing list. Patchwork is not clever enough to recognize a reposting. Old, superseded patches have to be manually marked as such (as long as they are not already set to "Changes Requested"). Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Disobedience: The silver lining to the cloud of servitude. - Ambrose Bierce _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
