On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 12:52:06AM +0800, Sune Brian wrote: > Tom Rini <[email protected]> 於 2025年12月2日週二 上午12:44寫道： > > > > On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 08:46:14AM +0800, Sune Brian wrote: > > > Tom Rini <[email protected]> 於 2025年11月29日週六 上午12:50寫道： > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 06:44:12PM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 at 17:31, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 10:11:53AM +0800, Yuslaimi, Alif Zakuan > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 27/11/2025 11:09 pm, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > > > > [CAUTION: This email is from outside your organization. Unless > > > > > > > > you trust > > > > > > > > the sender, do not click on links or open attachments as it may > > > > > > > > be a > > > > > > > > fraudulent email attempting to steal your information and/or > > > > > > > > compromise > > > > > > > > your computer.] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/27/25 3:12 AM, Yuslaimi, Alif Zakuan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I already have the referenced commit in my test branch, and I > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > confirm that the same compilation error still appears on > > > > > > > > > CycloneV when > > > > > > > > > certain directories produce no SPL objects. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The existing fix ensures that built-in.o is always present, > > > > > > > > > but it does > > > > > > > > > not prevent ar from generating empty built-in.a archives, > > > > > > > > > which older > > > > > > > > > ARM 32-bit linkers (such as CycloneV toolchains) reject as > > > > > > > > > “file > > > > > > > > > truncated”. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which toolchain is this ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am using Linaro arm-linux-gnueabihf GCC 7.5.0 to compile our > > > > > > > SoC32 devices > > > > > > > - CycloneV and Arria10 > > > > > > > > > > > > Ilias, do you recall the solution to this problem from when it came > > > > > > up > > > > > > on IRC a few weeks ago? > > > > > > > > > > Nop unfortunately not. > > > > > Was this caused by the Kbuild bump? I remember the logic around > > > > > builtin changing significantly. > > > > > > > > Yes, and I kinda thought we narrowed it down to something being missing > > > > from the update, since the kernel does support this old of a toolchain > > > > (or at least the 10.x? someone else this on). > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > Actually I am not sure u-boot itself have minimum requirement on each tag > > > or branch listed? > > > > We do not currently have a test for anything other than "newer than > > gcc-6" for ARM, but should have the same minimum requirements as the > > linux kernel, but are lacking enforcement checks (but I also think the > > kernel is?). > > > > -- > > Tom > > Hi Tom, > > Oops, missing the kernel version. Add it back for better debug.
Sorry, what I meant was that it's a kbuild related issue as to what version of gcc can be used. We don't have a check, and should, but also the versions in question here should be expected to work. There's just some change we're missing. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
