On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:20 PM Sam Protsenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 9:40 AM Richard Weinberger > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2025 19:05 Sam Protsenko wrote: > > > > I think we need to distinguish two cases: > > > > 1. The caller explicitly does not want to have an initramfs. e.g. you > > > > run "bootm addr1 - addr3". > > > > > > Yes, so fdt_delprop() lines should be probably moved to appropriate > > > users, e.g. image_setup_linux(). Can you take care of this? I'm in the > > > middle of something else right now and can't spend too much time on > > > this. Or we can just revert this patch for now, to fix EFI apps > > > breakage. > > > > I'll try to allocate time for that. > > Are we in a hurry? I'm fine with reverting but since the next release is > > months > > away and the change is only in next I'd first try to find a solution. > > > > No, you're right, we have time. I specifically reported the issue > instead of sending a revert, so that we can try and look for a > solution. So I'm ok waiting, if you have time to sort this out. Please > add me to Cc: when you send a patch, I can test it on my HW for you. >
Hey Richard, Did you have a chance to look into reworking this patch? I'm still carrying a revert locally (to make GBL EFI app work), and would like to get rid of it. Please advice if you have a plan on handling this in the near future. Thanks! > P.S. The change is in master already btw, not only in -next, it's MW right > now. > > > Thanks, > > //richard > > > > -- > > sigma star gmbh | Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 6, 6020 Innsbruck, AUT UID/VAT Nr: > > ATU 66964118 | FN: 374287y > > > >
