Hi Tom, On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 15:55, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 06:51:17AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > This function is useful for other scripts, so add a parameter to specify > > the image name, if desired. > > > > Also add a flag to quieten the output of some of the tools, since in > > many cases we only want to see warnings / errors. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > --- > > > > test/py/tests/fs_helper.py | 18 +++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > Applied to sjg/master, thanks! > > You have been repeatedly asked to not send messages about your personal > tree to the list. Please stop sending these messages (and I hope you > didn't change the patchwork status too, again).
We are still not really on the same page here. This series is showing as rejected in patchwork, so I've applied it to my tree and sent an appropriate message. While we are in this state of your rejecting my patches, I am not sure what else I can do. I have already renamed the tree, as you requested, so there should be no confusion that this is my tree. If there is still confusion, then perhaps the rename (which took quite a bit of effort) was not effective in resolving your concerns? If you do take a pull request (e.g. for one of the 100+ patches assigned to me in patchwork right now), the patches will then be in your tree, so presumably need to be marked 'accepted' in patchwork. When would be the best time for me to change this status? BTW, I'm really not sure why you have rejected this particular patch. Even if you don't want scripts maintained in your tree, this is really just a small tweak. It will help reduce the delta between our trees. Regards, Simon
