On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 10:30:35AM -0600, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:10:30PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 09:04, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:52:37AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 08:06, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 07:11:56AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 09:33, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 09:04:45AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 08:06, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 07:04:27PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This file reads from the environment but does not include > > > > > > > > > > the correct > > > > > > > > > > header. Update it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Drop the unnecessary config.h while we are here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you sure about that? It was explicitly added in commit > > > > > > > > > ab61cc7d98f6 ("board: congatec: Remove <common.h> and add > > > > > > > > > needed > > > > > > > > > includes") probably because of CFG_SYS_... usage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I assumed it wouldn't build if it had it, but perhaps that > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > incorrect? I understood that CFG_ things had to be values and > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > couldn't #idef them? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The cases where in that series I added config.h were for good > > > > > > > reason, > > > > > > > either failure to build or tricky size change reasons. All were > > > > > > > intentional. An audit-and-remove of config.h would be it's own > > > > > > > series as > > > > > > > yes, there's perhaps not the need now as whatever complex chain > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > unwound. > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh dear, OK. I'll respin the series. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm but I see you have sent a series that does some similar > > > > > > tweak[1]. > > > > > > What was the goal there? > > > > > > > > > > I fixed your problem. Please don't bother re-spinning this series, > > > > > it's > > > > > not clear what problems it's solving correctly. > > > > > > > > OK thanks. The problem was trying to include net.h in include/efi.h: > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20250501010456.3930701-1-...@chromium.org/ > > > > > > Adding headers to headers needs extra care (so that we don't end up with > > > massive implicit include chains). > > > > > > > So long as that works, we're fine. Having said that, even if it were a > > > > problem, we could always refactor things to put the Ethernet decls in > > > > a separate header. > > > > > > Yes, if there's some problem down the line then some refactoring is > > > likely the thing to look at, not adding more headers to C files (the > > > right path is to unwind the header chain and fix C files, your series > > > doesn't remove env.h from any header). > > > > I hope we haven't got confused here. > > > > My series removed env.h from being *transitively* included. I had to > > add it to C files due to that. > > Yes, which may or may not be helpful. A transitive include in a C file > is not terrible, otherwise many files will have 20+ includes. A > transitive include in header file, which in turn pulls in another which > pulls in another, is a problem. And the header should be unwound and C > files then fixed. > > > Your series doesn't help with including net.h in efi.h - you can try > > that and see that it still fails. > > Perhaps I took it out too quickly then, I'd have sworn I build sandbox > with that change added.
Yeah, I guess I removed it too quick and missed fixing drivers/usb/gadget/epautoconf.c still, along with whatever the right answer is for unwinding the exfat oddity. Likely seeing what the pain is over using the normal byteswap headers instead. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature