Hi Tom,

On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 09:33, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 09:04:45AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 08:06, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 07:04:27PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > This file reads from the environment but does not include the correct
> > > > header. Update it.
> > > >
> > > > Drop the unnecessary config.h while we are here.
> > >
> > > Are you sure about that? It was explicitly added in commit
> > > ab61cc7d98f6 ("board: congatec: Remove <common.h> and add needed
> > > includes") probably because of CFG_SYS_... usage.
> >
> > Well I assumed it wouldn't build if it had it, but perhaps that is
> > incorrect? I understood that CFG_ things had to be values and you
> > couldn't #idef them?
>
> The cases where in that series I added config.h were for good reason,
> either failure to build or tricky size change reasons. All were
> intentional. An audit-and-remove of config.h would be it's own series as
> yes, there's perhaps not the need now as whatever complex chain was
> unwound.

Oh dear, OK. I'll respin the series.

Hmm but I see you have sent a series that does some similar tweak[1].
What was the goal there?

Regards,
Simon

[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=455004

Reply via email to