On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 9:13 PM Marek Vasut <marek.va...@mailbox.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/19/25 2:42 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
> > Much of the data that is display by imx8_cpu.c is also
> > displayed from arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu.c, except the
> > speed grade and temperature unless the SoC is an i.MX9.
> > Expand this to include checks for IMX_THERMAL or IMX_TMU
> > in the same way it's done for mach-imx/cpu.c.
> >
> > Before:
> > CPU: NXP i.MX8MP Rev1.1 A53 at 1200 MHz
> > Model: Beacon EmbeddedWorks i.MX8MPlus Development kit
> >
> > After:
> > CPU: NXP i.MX8MP Rev1.1 A53 at 1200 MHz
> > CPU: Industrial temperature grade (-40C to 105C) at 28C
> > Model: Beacon EmbeddedWorks i.MX8MPlus Development kit
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford...@gmail.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpu/imx8_cpu.c b/drivers/cpu/imx8_cpu.c
> > index 53d31b3c0bf..facd561022f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpu/imx8_cpu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpu/imx8_cpu.c
> > @@ -177,7 +177,9 @@ static int cpu_imx_get_desc(const struct udevice *dev,
> > char *buf, int size)
> > ret = snprintf(buf, size, "NXP i.MX%s Rev%s %s at %u MHz",
> > plat->type, plat->rev, plat->name, plat->freq_mhz);
> >
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMX9)) {
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMX9) ||
> > + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMX_THERMAL) ||
> > + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMX_TMU)) {
>
> Can CONFIG_IMX9 instead select CONFIG_IMX_THERMAL or CONFIG_IMX_TMU , so
> the SoC specific check could be removed from here ?
Any idea which of IMX_THERMAL or IMX_TMU should be selected or
implied? I don't have an IMX9 to test.
adam
