Hi Simon, On Wednesday 01 June 2011 07:43 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:54 AM, V, Aneesh<ane...@ti.com> wrote: >> Hi Wolfgang, >> >> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Wolfgang Denk<w...@denx.de> wrote: >>> Dear Aneesh V, >>> >>> In message<4dd23561.70...@ti.com> you wrote: >>>> >>>> In fact I had searched for a macro for similar needs as my >>>> set_bit_field() is addressing in Linux Kernel too but didn't find any. >>> ... >>>> I couldn't find any utility macros/functions for doing something like >>>> this. >>>> >>>> Please somebody correct me if I am wrong. >>> >>> I am not aware of such a functionality in the Linux kernel, either. >>> >>> A quick search did not even show any attempts to introduce such macros >>> to Linux. It appears they don't need such a feature ? >> >> Wolfgang, what's your final take on this. Can I continue to use the utility >> macros given that I don't have any 'standard' alternative. For register >> accesses I shall move to setclrbits*() macros that you had suggested. >> But for bit operations I do not have any alternatives. >> >> best regards, >> Aneesh >> > > Hi Aneesh, > > If it helps, I will email a cleaned up bitfield patch to the list > tomorrow. I hoping that it will get a warm reception :-)
Thanks. That's great news at least for me. best regards, Aneesh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
