Dear Simon Glass, In message <BANLkTi=zl-whpe9mxdgbzzxoeaz10pb...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > Being a boot loader, charged with basic hardware initialisation, I believe > bitfield access primitives should be well-supported by U-Boot.
I agree, and they are. > Would you consider an RFC patch to add pan-U-Boot bitfield operations? > Failing that, how about just for ARM? I fail to understand what you mean. We already have such implementations in place. I just oobject against adding new, non-standard ones when the existing ones perform the same purpose. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de I think it's a new feature. Don't tell anyone it was an accident. :-) -- Larry Wall on s/foo/bar/eieio in <10...@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov> _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
