Yao Zi <zi...@disroot.org> schrieb am So., 2. März 2025, 17:02:

> On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 03:21:18PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > Don't assume that u32 and u64 are already defined.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/include/asm/setjmp.h | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/setjmp.h
> b/arch/arm/include/asm/setjmp.h
> > index 662bec86321..9a7f5af9f8f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/setjmp.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/setjmp.h
> > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> >  #ifndef _SETJMP_H_
> >  #define _SETJMP_H_   1
> >
> > +#include <asm-generic/int-ll64.h>
> > +
>
> >  /*
> >   * This really should be opaque, but the EFI implementation wrongly
> >   * assumes that a 'struct jmp_buf_data' is defined.
>
> With PATCH 4 of the series, this comment isn't true anymore. Should we
> fix it up at the same time?
>

The comment is removed in patch 3.

https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20250302142121.150480-4-heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com/T/#u

Best regards

Heinrich

Reply via email to