Sam Edwards <cfswo...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 24. Feb. 2025, 06:56:
> This was not proper: A .text section is SHT_PROGBITS, while the .dynamic
> section is SHT_DYNAMIC. Attempting to combine them like this creates a
> section type mismatch.
>
> It seems that while GNU ld does not complain, LLVM's lld considers this
> an error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <cfswo...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com>
> ---
> lib/efi_loader/elf_efi.ldsi | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/elf_efi.ldsi b/lib/efi_loader/elf_efi.ldsi
> index dc4d1a3660e..acf02eba4d6 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/elf_efi.ldsi
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/elf_efi.ldsi
> @@ -20,10 +20,10 @@ SECTIONS
> *(.gnu.linkonce.t.*)
> *(.srodata)
> *(.rodata*)
> - . = ALIGN(16);
> - *(.dynamic);
> - . = ALIGN(512);
> }
> + . = ALIGN(16);
> + .dynamic : { *(.dynamic) }
>
.dynamic is related to dynamic linking of libraries.
Under which circumstances would we have content in .dynamic? Why would it
be needed for executing an EFI application?
Best regards
Heinrich
+ . = ALIGN(512);
> .rela.dyn : { *(.rela.dyn) }
> .rela.plt : { *(.rela.plt) }
> .rela.got : { *(.rela.got) }
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
