On 09/02/2025 12:01, Marek Vasut wrote: > Allocate bb_miiphy using bb_miiphy_alloc() and fill in callbacks > currently listed in bb_miiphy_buses[] array. This is a temporary > duplication of assignment to avoid breakage, which will be removed > in follow up patches. At this point, the bb_miiphy callbacks can > reach these accessors by doing container_of() on struct mii_dev. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+rene...@mailbox.org>
[snip]
> + /* Copy the bus accessors, name and private data */
> + bb_miiphy->mdio_active = ravb_bb_mdio_active;
> + bb_miiphy->mdio_tristate = ravb_bb_mdio_tristate;
> + bb_miiphy->set_mdio = ravb_bb_set_mdio;
> + bb_miiphy->get_mdio = ravb_bb_get_mdio;
> + bb_miiphy->set_mdc = ravb_bb_set_mdc;
> + bb_miiphy->delay = ravb_bb_delay;
I would prefer that we have a separate `struct bb_miiphy_ops`, which can
be defined once (static and const) for each driver to reduce duplication
of the pointers in memory.
Something like:
struct bb_miiphy_ops {
int (*mdio_active)(struct bb_miiphy_bus *bus);
int (*mdio_tristate)(struct bb_miiphy_bus *bus);
int (*set_mdio)(struct bb_miiphy_bus *bus, int v);
int (*get_mdio)(struct bb_miiphy_bus *bus, int *v);
int (*set_mdc)(struct bb_miiphy_bus *bus, int v);
int (*delay)(struct bb_miiphy_bus *bus);
};
struct bb_miiphy_bus {
const struct bb_miiphy_ops *ops;
struct mii_dev mii;
void *priv;
};
We can make this change as a follow-up though as this patch series
otherwise looks good.
Reviewed-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker...@bp.renesas.com>
--
Paul Barker
OpenPGP_0x27F4B3459F002257.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
