Hi Yannic, On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 03:30, Yannic Moog <y.m...@phytec.de> wrote: > > The top level Makefile calls binman with fake-ext-blobs. > The test setup should reflect this to spot potential bugs before > reaching users. > > Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.m...@phytec.de> > --- > tools/binman/ftest.py | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/binman/ftest.py b/tools/binman/ftest.py > index a553ca9e564..1f194f9ecae 100644 > --- a/tools/binman/ftest.py > +++ b/tools/binman/ftest.py > @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ class TestFunctional(unittest.TestCase): > def _DoTestFile(self, fname, debug=False, map=False, update_dtb=False, > entry_args=None, images=None, use_real_dtb=False, > use_expanded=False, verbosity=None, allow_missing=False, > - allow_fake_blobs=False, extra_indirs=None, threads=None, > + allow_fake_blobs=True, extra_indirs=None, threads=None, > test_section_timeout=False, update_fdt_in_elf=None, > force_missing_bintools='', ignore_missing=False, > output_dir=None): > """Run binman with a given test file > > -- > 2.43.0 >
I would like this default to stay the same (False) because that is the normal case for Binman. We should expand the test-coverage as needed. Regards, Simon