Hi Marek, On 25/01/2025 12:56, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 1/21/25 3:38 PM, Paul Barker wrote: >> On 18/01/2025 06:53, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> Introduce mdio_init() split off from mdio_alloc(), which is used >>> to initialize already allocated struct mii_dev. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+rene...@mailbox.org> >> >> Replying here for the whole patch series... >> >> I like where we get to at the end of this series, but I don't like the >> intermediate state where the bb_miiphy_buses arrays still exist but are >> unused. I also think we should introduce a new ops struct so we're not >> duplicating function pointers in each instance of struct bb_miiphy_bus. >> >> I would prefer the following order of changes, let me know if you think >> this would be cleaner: >> >> 1) Introduce mdio_init(). >> >> 2) Add mii member to struct bb_miiphy_bus. >> >> 3) Modify each driver to use the mii member of the appropriate struct >> bb_miiphy_bus instance, calling mdio_init() instead of mdio_alloc(). >> At this point we're still using the instances in the statically >> allocated bb_miiphy_buses array. > > Those instances might be rodata , so using them as read-write storage > does not necessarily work , does it ?
None of the instances in the current U-Boot code are marked as const, and the name field is already modified at runtime by each driver. So I don't think we need to worry about them being rodata. Thanks, -- Paul Barker
OpenPGP_0x27F4B3459F002257.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature