Hi Marek,

On 25/01/2025 12:56, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 1/21/25 3:38 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
>> On 18/01/2025 06:53, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Introduce mdio_init() split off from mdio_alloc(), which is used
>>> to initialize already allocated struct mii_dev.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+rene...@mailbox.org>
>>
>> Replying here for the whole patch series...
>>
>> I like where we get to at the end of this series, but I don't like the
>> intermediate state where the bb_miiphy_buses arrays still exist but are
>> unused. I also think we should introduce a new ops struct so we're not
>> duplicating function pointers in each instance of struct bb_miiphy_bus.
>>
>> I would prefer the following order of changes, let me know if you think
>> this would be cleaner:
>>
>> 1) Introduce mdio_init().
>>
>> 2) Add mii member to struct bb_miiphy_bus.
>>
>> 3) Modify each driver to use the mii member of the appropriate struct
>>     bb_miiphy_bus instance, calling mdio_init() instead of mdio_alloc().
>>     At this point we're still using the instances in the statically
>>     allocated bb_miiphy_buses array.
> 
> Those instances might be rodata , so using them as read-write storage 
> does not necessarily work , does it ?

None of the instances in the current U-Boot code are marked as const,
and the name field is already modified at runtime by each driver. So I
don't think we need to worry about them being rodata.

Thanks,

-- 
Paul Barker

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x27F4B3459F002257.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to