*This Mail comes from Outside of SoftAtHome: *Do not answer, click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.**
Hi Philippe,
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 at 04:42, Philippe Reynes
<philippe.rey...@softathome.com> wrote:
Adds a test for the function sha256_hkdf.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Reynes <philippe.rey...@softathome.com>
---
test/lib/Makefile | 1 +
test/lib/test_sha256_hkdf.c | 104
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 test/lib/test_sha256_hkdf.c
diff --git a/test/lib/Makefile b/test/lib/Makefile
index 4c0abcba81a..24ce6ed8f00 100644
--- a/test/lib/Makefile
+++ b/test/lib/Makefile
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UT_LIB_ASN1) += asn1.o
obj-$(CONFIG_UT_LIB_RSA) += rsa.o
obj-$(CONFIG_AES) += test_aes.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SHA256) += test_sha256_hmac.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HKDF_MBEDTLS) += test_sha256_hkdf.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GETOPT) += getopt.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRC8) += test_crc8.o
obj-$(CONFIG_UT_LIB_CRYPT) += test_crypt.o
diff --git a/test/lib/test_sha256_hkdf.c b/test/lib/test_sha256_hkdf.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ca173a13afc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/lib/test_sha256_hkdf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2024 Philippe Reynes
<philippe.rey...@softathome.com>
+ *
+ * Unit tests for sha256_hkdf functions
+ */
+
+#include <command.h>
+#include <test/lib.h>
+#include <test/test.h>
+#include <test/ut.h>
+#include <u-boot/sha256.h>
+
+struct test_sha256_hkdf_s {
+ unsigned char *salt;
+ int saltlen;
+ unsigned char *ikm;
+ int ikmlen;
+ unsigned char *info;
+ int infolen;
+ unsigned char *expected;
+ int expectedlen;
+};
+
+/*
+ * data comes from:
+ * https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5869
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5869>
+ */
+static unsigned char salt_test1[] = {
+ 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06,
+ 0x07, 0x08, 0x09, 0x0a, 0x0b, 0x0c };
+
+static unsigned char ikm_test1[] = {
+ 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b,
0x0b, 0x0b,
+ 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b,
0x0b, 0x0b };
+
+static unsigned char info_test1[] = {
+ 0xf0, 0xf1, 0xf2, 0xf3, 0xf4, 0xf5, 0xf6, 0xf7, 0xf8, 0xf9 };
+
+static unsigned char expected_test1[] = {
+ 0x3c, 0xb2, 0x5f, 0x25, 0xfa, 0xac, 0xd5, 0x7a,
+ 0x90, 0x43, 0x4f, 0x64, 0xd0, 0x36, 0x2f, 0x2a,
+ 0x2d, 0x2d, 0x0a, 0x90, 0xcf, 0x1a, 0x5a, 0x4c,
+ 0x5d, 0xb0, 0x2d, 0x56, 0xec, 0xc4, 0xc5, 0xbf,
+ 0x34, 0x00, 0x72, 0x08, 0xd5, 0xb8, 0x87, 0x18,
+ 0x58, 0x65 };
+
+static struct test_sha256_hkdf_s test_sha256_hkdf[] = {
+ {
+ .salt = salt_test1,
+ .saltlen = sizeof(salt_test1),
+ .ikm = ikm_test1,
+ .ikmlen = sizeof(ikm_test1),
+ .info = info_test1,
+ .infolen = sizeof(info_test1),
+ .expected = expected_test1,
+ .expectedlen = sizeof(expected_test1),
+ },
+};
+
+static int _lib_test_sha256_hkdf_run(struct unit_test_state *uts,
+ unsigned char *salt, int saltlen,
+ unsigned char *ikm, int ikmlen,
+ unsigned char *info, int infolen,
+ unsigned char *expected, int
expectedlen)
+{
+ unsigned char output[64];
+
+ sha256_hkdf(salt, saltlen, ikm, ikmlen, info, infolen,
output, expectedlen);
I think we can add a few checkers here:
ut_assert(expectedlen <= sizeof(output));
int ret = sha256_hkdf(salt, saltlen, ikm, ikmlen, info, infolen,
output, expectedlen);
ut_assert(!ret);
[snip]
