On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 05:21:05PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > From my side I'd like to change the conversation a little, to how to > land code, rather than why we should bother. "Code needs to land" > should be the motto. If someone has taken the time to create > something, our bias should be towards getting it in, with sufficient > changes to make it fit the project. There are cases where something is > just a bad idea, or should be done another way, but for people working > on major features or changes, biasing towards not landing the code is > just going to make them go elsewhere.
This is the wrong approach I believe. The goal has always been and continues to be to have reviewed (whenever possible, our developer community is small) incremental change over time. Just because something has been posted a number of times does not mean it's ready to be merged. Your challenge today is that on patchwork you have over 150 patches covering a wide variety of topics and of which many series have technically-merited feedback that needs to be addressed in a technical manner. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
