Hi, On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 06:02, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 01:39, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 03:14:25PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Ilias, > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 04:41, Ilias Apalodimas > > > <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > > > We already have a mem info command, which is pretty useless. Can't we > > > > reuse that ? > > > > > > I am not too keen on using that as 'info' is pretty vague. We could > > > perhaps create a 'mem' command with 'info' as one subcommand and 'map' > > > as another? > > > > Are we talking about "meminfo" which literally only prints gd->ram_size? > > If so, I don't think it's worth worrying about enhancing that. > > Yes, that's the one
So, you mean to just delete that command and make it show the memory map instead? Or show the memory size at the top, before the memory map? Regards, Simon
