On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 03:14:25PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Ilias, > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 04:41, Ilias Apalodimas > <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > We already have a mem info command, which is pretty useless. Can't we > > reuse that ? > > I am not too keen on using that as 'info' is pretty vague. We could > perhaps create a 'mem' command with 'info' as one subcommand and 'map' > as another?
Are we talking about "meminfo" which literally only prints gd->ram_size? If so, I don't think it's worth worrying about enhancing that. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
