On 05/03/2011 08:48 AM, Alexander Stein wrote: Hi Alexander,
> Am Montag, 2. Mai 2011, 19:00:47 schrieb Wolfgang Denk: >> In message <201105021640.27241.alexander.st...@systec-electronic.com> you > wrote: >>> Ok, let me be more precise on this. >>> We used U-Boot v2010.09 on a custom board running on an I.MX35 (ARM1136). The i.MX35 is supported in u-boot mainline. As I can suppose, you start from the mx35pdk to port your code, probably you have good chances to use the last u-boot code. And then to send patches for your board, too... ;-) > >> 2. This is an ARM board. >> >> 3. This is an old version before cache support for ARM was added. > > This specific version was selected due to relocation problems on ARM. The mx35pdk board is supported in u-boot mainline using relocation. > expect the dcache doesn't have that big influence on the named code part as > the environment is already in RAM. Check in the mailing list, the numbers reported by people who measured the influence of cache say there is a big difference, specially when big chunks of code is copied, that is copying the kernel from storage before booting. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
