On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 11:30 PM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng....@oss.nxp.com> wrote:
> +void build_info(void)
> +{
> + u32 fw_version, sha1, res, status;
> + int ret;
> +
> + printf("\nBuildInfo:\n");
> +
> + ret = ele_get_fw_status(&status, &res);
> + if (ret) {
> + printf(" - ELE firmware status failed %d, 0x%x\n", ret, res);
> + } else if ((status & 0xff) == 1) {
> + ret = ele_get_fw_version(&fw_version, &sha1, &res);
> + if (ret) {
> + printf(" - ELE firmware version failed %d, 0x%x\n",
> ret, res);
> + } else {
> + printf(" - ELE firmware version %u.%u.%u-%x",
> + (fw_version & (0x00ff0000)) >> 16,
> + (fw_version & (0x0000fff0)) >> 4,
> + (fw_version & (0x0000000f)), sha1);
> + ((fw_version & (0x80000000)) >> 31) == 1 ?
> puts("-dirty\n") : puts("\n");
> + }
> + } else {
> + printf(" - ELE firmware not included\n");
> + }
> + puts("\n");
This build_info() is unrelated to changing the second MAC address layout.
It should be a separate patch.
