On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 05:46:19PM +0100, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> When using the FDT command to inspect an arbitrary FDT in memory, it
> will always be necessary to explicitly set the FDT address. However it
> is also quite likely that the command is being used to inspect U-Boot's
> own FDT. Simplify that common workflow of running "fdt addr -c" to get
> the control address and set it by just making $fdtcontroladdr the
> default FDT if there isn't one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.conno...@linaro.org>
> ---
> cmd/fdt.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/cmd/fdt.c b/cmd/fdt.c
> index d16b141ce32d..8909706e2483 100644
> --- a/cmd/fdt.c
> +++ b/cmd/fdt.c
> @@ -276,8 +276,17 @@ static int do_fdt(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int
> argc, char *const argv[])
>
> return CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
> }
>
> + /* Try using U-Boot's FDT by default */
> + if (!working_fdt) {
> + struct fdt_header *addr;
> +
> + addr = (void *)env_get_hex("fdtcontroladdr", 0);
> + if (addr && fdt_check_header(&addr))
> + set_working_fdt_addr((phys_addr_t)addr);
> + }
> +
> if (!working_fdt) {
> puts("No FDT memory address configured. Please configure\n"
> "the FDT address via \"fdt addr <address>\" command.\n"
> "Aborting!\n");Setting aside the behavior change (which I am thinking about), this makes the next check of !working_fdt dead code which should be removed. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
