On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 04:17:32PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 14:54, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 11:31:48AM +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote: > > > > > From: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > > > Use this new data structure in the utility function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.g...@linaro.org> > > > --- > > > lib/strto.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > This is rather big growth when we didn't already have realloc: > > 05: lib: Convert str_to_list() to use alist > > aarch64: (for 1/1 boards) all +1765.0 rodata +37.0 text +1728.0 > > xilinx_versal_mini_emmc0: all +1765 rodata +37 text +1728 > > u-boot: add: 7/0, grow: 1/0 bytes: 1728/0 (1728) > > function old new > > delta > > realloc - 1120 > > +1120 > > alist_ensure_ptr - 140 > > +140 > > alist_expand_to - 136 > > +136 > > alist_init - 108 > > +108 > > alist_uninit_move_ptr - 76 > > +76 > > alist_add_ptr - 72 > > +72 > > alist_uninit - 48 > > +48 > > str_to_list 204 232 > > +28 > > We can just drop this patch, perhaps? It was really just a demo of alist.
Yes, and no. The next good example would be on cortina_presidio-asic-pnand where the reason this series is a size growth rather than reduction (where it is BTW on LTO using platforms) is again, realloc. Is this just an unfortunate given then? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
