On 11/6/2023 5:49 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 16:03-20231104, Kumar, Udit wrote:
On 11/3/2023 6:07 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
When config is enabled, the esm dt probe makes sense. Simplify by
dropping board specific checks.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com>
---
board/ti/j721e/evm.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/ti/j721e/evm.c b/board/ti/j721e/evm.c
index d4f7c1d9f938..75d51a0552c4 100644
--- a/board/ti/j721e/evm.c
+++ b/board/ti/j721e/evm.c
@@ -531,10 +531,8 @@ err_free_gpio:
void spl_board_init(void)
{
-#if defined(CONFIG_ESM_K3) || defined(CONFIG_ESM_PMIC)
struct udevice *dev;
int ret;
-#endif
if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TARGET_J721E_A72_EVM) ||
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TARGET_J7200_A72_EVM)) &&
@@ -543,24 +541,20 @@ void spl_board_init(void)
probe_daughtercards();
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_ESM_K3
- if (board_ti_k3_is("J721EX-PM2-SOM")) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_K3)) {
ret = uclass_get_device_by_driver(UCLASS_MISC,
DM_DRIVER_GET(k3_esm), &dev);
if (ret)
printf("ESM init failed: %d\n", ret);
}
Nothing related to this patch, but to get esm completely functional
Second k3_esm probing needs to be added in this file.
Also, DT changes are needed, in next sync
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231013102941.548209-1-n-fran...@ti.com/
Understood. no action on the current series, I assume.
yes, no action on current series.
Reviewed-by: Udit Kumar <u-kum...@ti.com>
