On 16:03-20231104, Kumar, Udit wrote:
>
> On 11/3/2023 6:07 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > When config is enabled, the esm dt probe makes sense. Simplify by
> > dropping board specific checks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com>
> > ---
> > board/ti/j721e/evm.c | 10 ++--------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/board/ti/j721e/evm.c b/board/ti/j721e/evm.c
> > index d4f7c1d9f938..75d51a0552c4 100644
> > --- a/board/ti/j721e/evm.c
> > +++ b/board/ti/j721e/evm.c
> > @@ -531,10 +531,8 @@ err_free_gpio:
> > void spl_board_init(void)
> > {
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_ESM_K3) || defined(CONFIG_ESM_PMIC)
> > struct udevice *dev;
> > int ret;
> > -#endif
> > if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TARGET_J721E_A72_EVM) ||
> > IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TARGET_J7200_A72_EVM)) &&
> > @@ -543,24 +541,20 @@ void spl_board_init(void)
> > probe_daughtercards();
> > }
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_ESM_K3
> > - if (board_ti_k3_is("J721EX-PM2-SOM")) {
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_K3)) {
> > ret = uclass_get_device_by_driver(UCLASS_MISC,
> > DM_DRIVER_GET(k3_esm), &dev);
> > if (ret)
> > printf("ESM init failed: %d\n", ret);
> > }
>
> Nothing related to this patch, but to get esm completely functional
>
> Second k3_esm probing needs to be added in this file.
>
>
> Also, DT changes are needed, in next sync
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231013102941.548209-1-n-fran...@ti.com/
>
>
Understood. no action on the current series, I assume.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5
849D 1736 249D
