On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 03:30:48 -0500
Samuel Holland <sam...@sholland.org> wrote:

> Hi Andre,
> 
> On 9/28/23 16:54, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > So far we were open-coding the pincontroller's GPIO output/input access
> > in each function using that.
> > 
> > Provide functions that wrap that nicely, and follow the existing pattern
> > (set/get_{bank,}), so users don't need to know about the internals, and
> > we can abstract the new D1 pinctrl more easily.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/sunxi_gpio.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/sunxi_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/sunxi_gpio.c
> > index 71c3168b755..a4b336943b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/sunxi_gpio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/sunxi_gpio.c
> > @@ -81,6 +81,19 @@ int sunxi_gpio_get_cfgpin(u32 pin)
> >     return sunxi_gpio_get_cfgbank(pio, pin);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void sunxi_gpio_set_output_bank(struct sunxi_gpio *pio,
> > +                                  int pin, bool set)
> > +{
> > +   u32 mask = 1U << pin;
> > +
> > +   clrsetbits_le32(&pio->dat, set ? 0 : mask, set ? mask : 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sunxi_gpio_get_output_bank(struct sunxi_gpio *pio, int pin)  
> 
> "get_output" is a bit misleading when this pin is an input, so maybe
> "set_value" and "get_value" would be more accurate.

Good point, changed that.

> 
> > +{
> > +   return !!(readl(&pio->dat) & (1U << pin));
> > +}
> > +
> >  void sunxi_gpio_set_drv(u32 pin, u32 val)
> >  {
> >     u32 bank = GPIO_BANK(pin);
> > @@ -117,35 +130,20 @@ void sunxi_gpio_set_pull_bank(struct sunxi_gpio *pio, 
> > int bank_offset, u32 val)
> >  /* =========== Non-DM code, used by the SPL. ============ */
> >  
> >  #if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_GPIO)
> > -static int sunxi_gpio_output(u32 pin, u32 val)
> > +static void sunxi_gpio_set_output(u32 pin, bool set)
> >  {
> > -   u32 dat;
> >     u32 bank = GPIO_BANK(pin);
> > -   u32 num = GPIO_NUM(pin);
> >     struct sunxi_gpio *pio = BANK_TO_GPIO(bank);
> >  
> > -   dat = readl(&pio->dat);
> > -   if (val)
> > -           dat |= 0x1 << num;
> > -   else
> > -           dat &= ~(0x1 << num);
> > -
> > -   writel(dat, &pio->dat);
> > -
> > -   return 0;
> > +   sunxi_gpio_set_output_bank(pio, GPIO_NUM(pin), set);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int sunxi_gpio_input(u32 pin)
> > +static int sunxi_gpio_get_output(u32 pin)
> >  {
> > -   u32 dat;
> >     u32 bank = GPIO_BANK(pin);
> > -   u32 num = GPIO_NUM(pin);
> >     struct sunxi_gpio *pio = BANK_TO_GPIO(bank);
> >  
> > -   dat = readl(&pio->dat);
> > -   dat >>= num;
> > -
> > -   return dat & 0x1;
> > +   return sunxi_gpio_get_output_bank(pio, GPIO_NUM(pin));
> >  }
> >  
> >  int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
> > @@ -168,18 +166,21 @@ int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio)
> >  int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value)
> >  {
> >     sunxi_gpio_set_cfgpin(gpio, SUNXI_GPIO_OUTPUT);
> > +   sunxi_gpio_set_output(gpio, value);
> >  
> > -   return sunxi_gpio_output(gpio, value);
> > +   return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
> >  {
> > -   return sunxi_gpio_input(gpio);
> > +   return sunxi_gpio_get_output(gpio);
> >  }
> >  
> >  int gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
> >  {
> > -   return sunxi_gpio_output(gpio, value);
> > +   sunxi_gpio_set_output(gpio, value);
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  int sunxi_name_to_gpio(const char *name)
> > @@ -231,13 +232,8 @@ int sunxi_name_to_gpio(const char *name)
> >  static int sunxi_gpio_get_value(struct udevice *dev, unsigned offset)
> >  {
> >     struct sunxi_gpio_plat *plat = dev_get_plat(dev);
> > -   u32 num = GPIO_NUM(offset);
> > -   unsigned dat;
> > -
> > -   dat = readl(&plat->regs->dat);
> > -   dat >>= num;
> >  
> > -   return dat & 0x1;
> > +   return sunxi_gpio_get_output_bank(plat->regs, offset) & 0x1;  
> 
> You don't need the "& 0x1" anymore. Otherwise:

Ah, correct, we have a !! in the callee now. Fixed.

> Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <sam...@sholland.org>

Thanks!
Andre

> 
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int sunxi_gpio_get_function(struct udevice *dev, unsigned offset)
> > @@ -275,9 +271,8 @@ static int sunxi_gpio_set_flags(struct udevice *dev, 
> > unsigned int offset,
> >  
> >     if (flags & GPIOD_IS_OUT) {
> >             u32 value = !!(flags & GPIOD_IS_OUT_ACTIVE);
> > -           u32 num = GPIO_NUM(offset);
> >  
> > -           clrsetbits_le32(&plat->regs->dat, 1 << num, value << num);
> > +           sunxi_gpio_set_output_bank(plat->regs, offset, value);
> >             sunxi_gpio_set_cfgbank(plat->regs, offset, SUNXI_GPIO_OUTPUT);
> >     } else if (flags & GPIOD_IS_IN) {
> >             u32 pull = 0;  
> 

Reply via email to