Dear Reinhard, Yes, the problems were mainly due to my ignorance with respect to git: I thought that rework110218 was just a later version of rework110202, which is clearly not the case. I probably also did not create a new branch, which had the effect that you see 17 patches, which were not mine. Ok, I think I am slowly improving. I started from scratch and first compiled your at91sam9260ek version, which compiles fine when using the nand flash version but fails on the dataflash version. Then I modified my files, always watching what you had done in the at91sam9260ek version. I think that now I exclusively touch files that are specific to the at91sam9263ek and nothing else. I will still take a few days to check everything before making another attempt to send the patches. Thanks again for your patience with me. Uli
Sorry, this has to get a full NAK. 1. Please never hijack someone's thread! Your patch has nothing to do with someone's PATCH 18/18. 2. You are undoing all rework efforts with this patch! The rework was, amongst others, to get rid of all AT91_*, AT91<SoC>_*, AVR* macros and unify them into ATMEL_* macros. And by that also remove the twofold re-wrapping of those defines. It seems you have not understood the concept of "CONFIG_" macros. They are to allow the designer to use different USARTs, not explicitly only the one in the debug unit... 3. And, please, run your patches through checkpatch.pl Best Regards, Reinhard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
