On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 00:23:46 Aneesh V wrote: > BSS footprint of fat.c is very high. It has three buffers each of size > 64KB. To workaround this problem I have done something like below(The > way x-loader works around this problem today). > CONFIG_SYS_SPL_FAT_BUFFER_BASE is in SDRAM.Is this ok? > > Also, I was wondering why we need 3 such scratch buffers in this > implementation. I do not understand this code. But I was wondering if we > could work with just one 64K buffer?
i'd be pretty surprised if these couldnt be cleaned up in some way. sucking up 64KiB * 3 just for vfat is pretty f-in crazy. no other FS code needs this. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
