Hello Wolfgang, Albert, On Saturday 05 February 2011 12:28 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Aneesh, > > Le 03/02/2011 11:38, Aneesh V a écrit : > >> On second thoughts I would like to keep the entire bss in SDRAM. With >> MMC and FAT support, the SPL is already nearing the IRAM budget in >> OMAP3. It helps to save some space by moving out bss to SDRAM. >> >> If needed, I can fix up the start.S by defining something like >> _end_of_data. But is that really needed. I do not see any SPL that >> needs relocation and SDRAM bss at the same time. > > "Patches Welcome" :) -- with added thanks for patching all start.S / > u-boot.lds in the ARM arch consistently.
I see __u_boot_cmd_end as the end of the image to be relocated in all the scripts. Shall I use this label for this purpose. This will work for now and save me from touching all those linker scripts. However, there is a small possibility of this leading to the same problem as with __bss_start in future. I don't think that should be a big concern. Do you agree? Best regards, Aneesh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
