On 11/04/2023 01:21, jaswinder.si...@linaro.org wrote: > From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.si...@linaro.org> > > Any requirement of FWU should not require changes to bindings > of other subsystems. For example, for mtd-backed storage we > can do without requiring 'fixed-partitions' children to also > carry 'uuid', a property which is non-standard and not in the > bindings. > > There exists no code yet, so we can change the fwu-mtd bindings > to contain all properties within the fwu-mdata node. > > Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.si...@linaro.org> > --- > > Hi Rob, Hi Krzysztof, > > I was suggested, and I agree, it would be a good idea to get your blessings > for the location and meta-data (fwu-mdata) bindings for the FWU. > > The FWU images can be located in GPT partitions or MTD backed storage. > The basic bindings for fwu-mdata has already been merged in uboot (ideally > they > too should have had your review). Now I am trying to fully support MTD backed > storage and hence looking for your review. The proposed bindings are totally > self-contained and don't require changes to any other subsystem. > > Thanks.
I think we do not review U-Boot bindings usually, except these put in the Linux kernel. There were few targeting U-Boot specifically (e.g. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/u-boot.yaml and Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/u-boot,env.yaml) so if you want our blessing, the bindings should be done in Linux kernel repo. I am pretty sure that reviewing other project bindings would be too much of work for me. Best regards, Krzysztof
