Le 28/01/2011 19:08, Haiying Wang a écrit : >> I see patch 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, and 7/7. Where are the rest? > Sorry, patch 7/7 is a wrong number here. I kept the patch # as 3/8/, > 4/8, 5/8, 8/8 to be consistent with the order in the patchset(v2) I > submitted in last December. I thought it would be clearer to compare > them with v2 version and review. Patch 1/8,2/8 have been applied by > Kumar, patch 6/8, 7/8 remain the same as v2 version. This patch, is a > new patch because that TPL still needs --gc-sections in linker option to > do partial link. > > If it is preferable to have new whole set of patch, I can reorder them > from 3/8-8/8 plus this one to submit.
I would suggest to simply number patches from 1 to N for each version even if that means the same patch gets numbered differently across versions, because readers of a given version may not have read the previous one. A patchset should be self-sufficient and self-consistent IMO. Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
