On 2/23/23 08:17, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Hello Marek & Ralph,
marek.va...@mailbox.org wrote on Thu, 23 Feb 2023 01:12:49 +0100:
On 2/22/23 20:32, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 07:45:45PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 2/22/23 19:32, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 06:47:44PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
Are those fixes in mainline Linux ?
Yes, they are in mainline:
2dee50ab9e72 clk: renesas: r9a06g032: Fix UART clkgrp bitsel
merged into 6.0, and also backported to earlier LTS branches
2a6da4a11f47 clk: renesas: r9a06g032: Fix the RTC hclock description
merged into 5.19, seems to be missing from LTS branches
Use Linux 6.2.y as a base then.
Okay, done.
And please submit the missing patches for LTS branch inclusion too if >>
possible, I guess they were missing Fixes: tag ?
Seems it was part of a series which added support for the RTC device:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220421090016.79517-3-miquel.ray...@bootlin.com/
Since it is new feature, I guess one could argue that the clock table > fix is
not needed in older LTS kernels, since no driver uses that clock.
But most likely it was just overlooked. I'll check with Miquel.
Much appreciated, thanks !
+CC Miquel
As Ralph rightly pointed out, even though the clock description was
wrong there was no user at that time so I did not bother with a Fixes
tag. Anyhow, as the change does only impact the RTC clock, it should be
harmless to backport if you want.
Either way is fine by me, I just want to be sure the u-boot clock tables
are in sync with Linux as much as possible, and can be easily resynced
in the future, that's all.
