On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 12:36:51AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 2/5/23 23:39, Simon Glass wrote: > > This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is > > no SPL_EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL2 defined in Kconfig > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > --- > > > > (no changes since v1) > > > > lib/efi_loader/efi_root_node.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_root_node.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_root_node.c > > index 21a014d7c21..108c14b95bd 100644 > > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_root_node.c > > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_root_node.c > > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ efi_status_t efi_root_node_register(void) > > &efi_guid_dt_fixup_protocol, > > &efi_dt_fixup_prot, > > #endif > > -#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL2) > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL2) > > I never received this patch in my inbox. Expect series with more than 50 > mails not even to be copied to the spam folder. They are outright rejected > by my mail provider. > > I cannot see any problem solved by this patch. Why did you send it?
You should look in to setting up lei to fetch the list then, as this is well explained in the cover letter. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
