I am against using "f1c100" in commit message, because there is a chip called F1C100 that is part of legacy sun3i instead of suniv.
Using "suniv" or "f1c100s" is better. 在 2022-10-12星期三的 17:34 +0100，Andre Przywara写道： > So far we stated the lack of a lowlevel() init function for the > F1C100s > board by defining the respective SKIP_* symbol in the board's > defconfig. However we don't expect any *board* to employ such low > level > code, so expect this to be never used for the ARMv5 Allwinner SoCs. > > Select the appropriate symbols in the Kconfig, so that we can remove > them from the defconfig, and avoid putting them in future defconfigs > for > other boards. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 2 ++ > configs/licheepi_nano_defconfig | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach- > sunxi/Kconfig > index 9aa66deb9fd..fc5d8bb3c19 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > @@ -185,6 +185,8 @@ config MACH_SUNIV > select CPU_ARM926EJS > select SUNXI_GEN_SUN6I > select SUPPORT_SPL > + select SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT_ONLY > + select SPL_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT_ONLY > > config MACH_SUN4I > bool "sun4i (Allwinner A10)" > diff --git a/configs/licheepi_nano_defconfig > b/configs/licheepi_nano_defconfig > index 14e6bcda927..09f1a19cdbe 100644 > --- a/configs/licheepi_nano_defconfig > +++ b/configs/licheepi_nano_defconfig > @@ -1,6 +1,4 @@ > CONFIG_ARM=y > -CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT_ONLY=y > -CONFIG_SPL_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT_ONLY=y > CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF=y > CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI=y > CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="suniv-f1c100s-licheepi-nano"
