On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 08:37, Quentin Schulz <foss+ub...@0leil.net> wrote: > > From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@theobroma-systems.com> > > The binary is looked on the system by the suffix of the packer class. > This means binman was looking for btool_gzip on the system and not gzip. > > Since a btool can have its btool_ prefix missing but its module and > binary presence on the system appropriately found, there's no need to > actually keep this prefix after listing all possible btools, so let's > remove it. > > This fixes gzip btool by letting Bintool.find_bintool_class handle the > missing prefix and still return the correct class which is then init > with gzip name instead of btool_gzip. > > Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+ub...@0leil.net> > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@theobroma-systems.com> > --- > tools/binman/bintool.py | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
