Hi
On 2022/7/4 17:23, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jul 2022, Kever Yang wrote:
Hi Lee Jones,
On 2022/6/27 16:39, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Lee Jones wrote:
Functions pointed to by this op pointer can return non-zero values
indicating an error. Ensure any error value is propagated back up the
call-chain.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Weekly check-in:
Are these still on someone's radar, or would you like me to [RESEND]?
It would be better to add leading message "rockchip:" in the subject.
That would be highly unusual.
Patch subjects are usually formed, as follows:
You should able to see many patches with "rockchip:" in U-Boot commit,
and also many patches
with other platform prefix like "imx:" or "sunxi:".
Not like kernel, U-Boot using the same mailing list for all soc
platform, so this can help easier
to identify which soc vendor it belongs to.
Thanks,
- Kever
"<subsystem>: <device>: <description>"
I only see 2 RAM-only patches (out of the 91 that touch this file)
that do as you suggested and you were the author of both of them. :)
