On Fri, 01 Jul 2022, Kever Yang wrote: > Hi Lee Jones, > > > On 2022/6/27 16:39, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > Functions pointed to by this op pointer can return non-zero values > > > indicating an error. Ensure any error value is propagated back up the > > > call-chain. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > > > --- > > > drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c | 4 +++- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Weekly check-in: > > > > Are these still on someone's radar, or would you like me to [RESEND]? > > It would be better to add leading message "rockchip:" in the subject.
That would be highly unusual. Patch subjects are usually formed, as follows: "<subsystem>: <device>: <description>" I only see 2 RAM-only patches (out of the 91 that touch this file) that do as you suggested and you were the author of both of them. :) -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
