On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:08:03PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > The whole point of this series is really to make it so that when we're > using patman for sending Linux patches that we don't pass "--no-tree" > to checkpatch. While doing that, though, I found a number of bugs > including an explanation about why recent version of patman have been > yelling about "tags" when used with Linux even though Linux is > supposed to have "process_tags" defaulted to False.
Awesome, I've been annoyed by the 'tags' thing, and just go used to using --no-tags. Glad to see you're fixing it. For the whole series: Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannor...@chromium.org> As noted, my brain isn't working so well on patch 6. But for patches 1-5 (modulo a small nit on 4): Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannor...@chromium.org>
