On Monday 16 May 2022 16:52:06 Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Pali, > > On 06.05.22 11:05, Pali Rohár wrote: > > If proper U-Boot on Turris Omnia tries to print something on debug UART > > then CPU hangs. Reason is that debug UART in proper U-Boot for Turris > > Omnia has incorrect configuration of base register. Base register is > > different in SPL and also in different stages of proper U-Boot. > > > > Fix all these issues. Introduce new arch_very_early_init() ARM function > > which will be called at very early stage prior initialization of debug > > UART. Move code which moves internal mvebu registers to this function. > > And split configuration of DEBUG_UART_BASE into SPL and proper U-Boot > > to allow setting different values which matches current HW status. > > > > With all these changes, it is possible call "printf" function in > > Turris Omnia's board_early_init_f() function in both SPL and proper > > U-Boot. > > > > Pali Rohár (5): > > arm: Add new config option ARCH_VERY_EARLY_INIT > > arm: mvebu: Move internal registers in arch_very_early_init() function > > serial: Add new config option SPL_DEBUG_UART_BASE > > serial: ns16550: Add support for SPL_DEBUG_UART_BASE > > arm: mvebu: turris_omnia: Fix DEBUG_UART_BASE > > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ > > arch/arm/lib/crt0.S | 5 +++++ > > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig | 1 + > > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Makefile | 1 + > > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/cpu.c | 31 ------------------------------- > > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/lowlevel.S | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > configs/turris_omnia_defconfig | 3 ++- > > drivers/serial/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ > > drivers/serial/ns16550.c | 4 ++-- > > 9 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/lowlevel.S > > This patchset seems to introduce problems on some non-MVEBU platforms > like x86, chromebook_coral_defconfig: > > drivers/serial/ns16550.c: In function ‘_debug_uart_init’: > ././include/linux/kconfig.h:51:32: error: ‘CONFIG_TPL_DEBUG_UART_BASE’ > undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean > ‘CONFIG_SPL_DEBUG_UART_BASE’? > 51 | #define __config_val(pfx, cfg) CONFIG_ ## pfx ## cfg > | ^~~~~~~ > ././include/linux/kconfig.h:50:32: note: in expansion of macro > ‘__config_val’ > 50 | #define _config_val(pfx, cfg) __config_val(pfx, cfg) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > ././include/linux/kconfig.h:49:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘_config_val’ > 49 | #define config_val(cfg) _config_val(_CONFIG_PREFIX, cfg) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > ././include/linux/kconfig.h:61:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘config_val’ > 61 | #define CONFIG_VAL(option) config_val(option) > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/serial/ns16550.c:328:54: note: in expansion of macro ‘CONFIG_VAL’ > 328 | struct ns16550 *com_port = (struct ns16550 > *)CONFIG_VAL(DEBUG_UART_BASE); > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > ././include/linux/kconfig.h:51:32: note: each undeclared identifier is > reported only once for each function it appears in > 51 | #define __config_val(pfx, cfg) CONFIG_ ## pfx ## cfg > | ^~~~~~~ > ././include/linux/kconfig.h:50:32: note: in expansion of macro > ‘__config_val’ > 50 | #define _config_val(pfx, cfg) __config_val(pfx, cfg) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > ././include/linux/kconfig.h:49:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘_config_val’ > 49 | #define config_val(cfg) _config_val(_CONFIG_PREFIX, cfg) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > ././include/linux/kconfig.h:61:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘config_val’ > 61 | #define CONFIG_VAL(option) config_val(option) > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/serial/ns16550.c:328:54: note: in expansion of macro ‘CONFIG_VAL’ > 328 | struct ns16550 *com_port = (struct ns16550 > *)CONFIG_VAL(DEBUG_UART_BASE); > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/serial/ns16550.c: In function ‘_debug_uart_putc’: > ././include/linux/kconfig.h:51:32: error: ‘CONFIG_TPL_DEBUG_UART_BASE’ > undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean > ‘CONFIG_SPL_DEBUG_UART_BASE’? > 51 | #define __config_val(pfx, cfg) CONFIG_ ## pfx ## cfg > | ^~~~~~~ > ././include/linux/kconfig.h:50:32: note: in expansion of macro > ‘__config_val’ > 50 | #define _config_val(pfx, cfg) __config_val(pfx, cfg) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > ././include/linux/kconfig.h:49:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘_config_val’ > 49 | #define config_val(cfg) _config_val(_CONFIG_PREFIX, cfg) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > ././include/linux/kconfig.h:61:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘config_val’ > 61 | #define CONFIG_VAL(option) config_val(option) > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/serial/ns16550.c:363:54: note: in expansion of macro ‘CONFIG_VAL’ > 363 | struct ns16550 *com_port = (struct ns16550 > *)CONFIG_VAL(DEBUG_UART_BASE); > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:258: tpl/drivers/serial/ns16550.o] > Error 1 > > Could you please take a look? > > Thanks, > Stefan
I totally forgot for TPL. Fixed in additional patch "serial: Add new config option TPL_DEBUG_UART_BASE" which I sent recently. With this patch chromebook_coral_defconfig with x86 compiler builds fine.
