Scott Wood wrote: >> You told me that since I'm doing a read following a write to uncached memory, >> > that I don't need a sync. > No, I was talking about a write followed by a read, to the same location.
That's what I said. Read following write == write followed by read. > out_8 should be fixed to behave like the other accessors. Ok, but I'm not using any of the I/O accessors, so this doesn't affect me. I just need to make sure that the read is executed after the write, and that the read completes before I continue. So I should I put an isync between the write and the read, and a sync after the read? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
