On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:06:48PM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote: > > > On 3/10/22 12:01 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:48:50 -0500 > > Sean Anderson <sean.ander...@seco.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > >> On 3/4/22 1:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 12:19:27PM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote: > >> >> Hi Andre, > >> >> > >> >> On 3/4/22 6:47 AM, Andre Przywara wrote: > >> >> > On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 02:06:03 +0100 > >> >> > Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > Hi, > >> >> > > >> >> > Linus, thanks for the heads up, much appreciated! > >> >> > > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 9:44 PM Sean Anderson > >> >> >> <sean.ander...@seco.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > The main device affected by these changes is vexpress64, so I'd > >> >> >> > appreciate > >> >> >> > if Linus (or anyone else) could try booting. > >> >> > > >> >> > As it happens, I am sitting on a series updating > >> >> > vexpress_aemv8a_semi, and > >> >> > letting it use OF_CONTROL. I will send this ASAP. > >> >> > As it turned out, the automatic semihosting boot command is actually > >> >> > broken > >> >> > in v2022.01, the fix is the first patch in my series. This clashes > >> >> > with > >> >> > this series, but it's easy to resolve. > >> >> > >> >> I, for one, appreciate that the boot command is no longer all one line > >> >> after > >> >> your series. > >> >> > >> >> Simon/Tom, which series would you like to be based off the other? > >> > > >> > I think it's however it's easiest for you two to collaborate. > >> > >> I think it will be cleaner for me to base my series on his, but I just > >> want to > >> avoid having to rebase a lot :) > > > > Yeah, it should just be this one line, though, right? > > Tom, would you consider taking patch 01/11 now, as this fixes a > > regression? The Sean could at least rebase on top of this. Rebasing on top > > of the rest should be more straight-forward, because it's not one > > super-long line anymore. > > The patch which makes the boot command multi-line is [PATCH 07/11] > vexpress64: fvp: > add distro_boot support. I'm not sure how much that patch depends on the > others, > but presumably you would need to apply 5 and 6 as well.
Um, so for clarity, should I take: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220304163018.3167841-2-andre.przyw...@arm.com/ or if it's more than just that, how about a regression-fixes-only series for me to take for this release? Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
