On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 10:19 -0700, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Haiying Wang, > > In message <1290702018.2007.4.ca...@haiying-laptop> you wrote: > > > > > - If CONFIG_SYS_LDCONFIG is not set, and the system is booting > from > > > NAND (CONFIG_NAND_U_BOOT is set), then a board specific linker > > > script board/$(BOARDDIR)/u-boot-nand.lds gets use. > > > > u-boot-nand.lds is not in board/$(BOARDDIR) for 85xx at least, it is > in > > $(SRCTREE)/$(CPUDIR)/ > > This is not correct - situation before applying my patches:
> -> find * -name u-boot-nand.lds > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot-nand.lds so your patch for arch/powerpc/config.mk will not get u-boot-nand.lds for mpc85xx boards, only for the boards below. Then 85xx boards still need to get the lds from board/$(BOARDIR)/config.mk. Is that what you want? > board/amcc/acadia/u-boot-nand.lds > board/amcc/bamboo/u-boot-nand.lds > board/amcc/canyonlands/u-boot-nand.lds > board/amcc/kilauea/u-boot-nand.lds > board/amcc/sequoia/u-boot-nand.lds > board/esd/pmc440/u-boot-nand.lds > board/samsung/smdk6400/u-boot-nand.lds > > > > - If we are not booting from NAND, we test if a processor specific > > > linker script arch/powerpc/cpu/$(CPU)/u-boot.lds exists; if so > we > > > use that. > > should we use $(CPUDIR) instead of arch/powerpc/cpu/$(CPU)? > > I'm not sure if CPUDIR is defined at that time. Did you try it out? CPUDIR is defined in config.mk, I tried it for 85xx/p1 boards and it worked. Haiying _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot