On 12/3/21 08:16, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Heinrich,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:01:27PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 01:02:55AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/16/21 00:51, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Is the patch good enough to include in the series?
If not, you could reply to it with what needs doing.
? I have already replied to your patch:)
Basically, it seems to be fine to me.
Regards,
Simon
The patch is not usable as is. It assumes only GPT partioning is used.
@Heinrich
I don't get your point. Either my patch or Simon's is not specific
to GPT at all.
So I'm going to start respinning my patch for a next round of discussion.
A field name gpt_part_info obviously relates to GPT?
No.
IICU, the structure, disk_partition, is not particularly GPT-specific
as such type of data are used over various partition drivers.
In my patch series, I simply reuse "struct disk_part" as a structure
holding a partition number and partition information (= disk_partition).
So do you agree that we won't have "partition-table" devices for now?
-Takahiro Akashi
We don't need the partition-table to be a udevice now. We still can
later convert the partition drivers to a uclass if we deem it helpful.
Best regards
Heinrich
-Takahiro Akashi
Up to now this string exists only in cmd/gpt.c.
Best regards
Heinrich
-Takahiro Akashi
Instead all partition table drivers need to be converted to drivers for
the new uclass.
Best regards
Heinrich
