On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 09:58:48 Detlev Zundel wrote:
> > On Monday, November 15, 2010 07:13:03 Sebastien Carlier wrote:
> >> On 2010-11-15 11:54:07, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >> > I notice that the patch affects the size of the resulting U-Boot
> >> > images.
> >> > 
> >> > For example:
> >> > 
> >> > Configuring for MiniFAP - Board: TQM5200, Options: MINIFAP
> >> > 
> >> >    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> >> >  
> >> >  358144   35208  303248  696600   aa118 ./u-boot before
> >> >  361340   35824  303332  700496   ab050 ./u-boot after
> >> > 
> >> > -------------------------------
> >> > 
> >> >          Delta:   +3896 Bytes
> >> > 
> >> > For other boards it's only a few hundred bytes, but why do we see
> >> > such big increase here?
> >> 
> >> In this case, these libraries contribute 3260 bytes in unused
> >> definitions:
> >> 
> >> In each case, a whole object file contains exactly the unused
> >> definitions, and could be excluded in the respective Makefile.
> > 
> > or just use -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections/-Wl,--gc-sections and
> > dont worry about it.  which is what we do for the Blackfin port.
> 
> If you do worry, you can use the "--gc-sections" together with
> "--print-gc-sections" to actually find out what is unused[1].

the u-boot.map also mentions which input sections are discarded without 
needing --print-gc-sections ...
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to