Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > Trial and error suggests that map_flash_by_law1 needs > an isync(padding with 4 nop's also did the trick) > after updating LBLAWAR1 to make sure the the change has > reached the HW before continuing with the code that depends on it. > Add an isync to remap_flash_by_law0 for good measure too.
To be totally safe, we probably want to do a readback plus twi (to turn a data dependency into a flow dependency) before the isync. -Scott
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
