Hi Alexandru,
I agree with this series.
Use CONFIG_HASH is more general than adding new CONFIG_HASH_CALCULATE.
Thanks,
Masahisa Kojima
On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 04:28, Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I had accidentally noticed commit 87316da05f2f ("lib: introduce
> HASH_CALCULATE option"), when rebasing an unrelated series. It
> immediately caught my attention because It seemed to me to increase
> complexity, without any actual benefit.
>
> In this series, I present an alternative approach, which solves the
> problem by leveraging existing infrastructure instead of adding more
> Kconfig variables.
>
> Alexandru Gagniuc (2):
> Revert "lib: introduce HASH_CALCULATE option"
> efi_loader: Work-around build issue due to missing hash_calculate()
>
> common/Kconfig.boot | 1 -
> lib/Kconfig | 3 ---
> lib/Makefile | 2 +-
> lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
