On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:54:39AM +0000, Priyanka Jain wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> > >Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2021 5:45 PM > >To: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.j...@nxp.com>; Ramon Fried > ><rfried....@gmail.com>; Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>; u- > >b...@lists.denx.de > >Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>; Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.olt...@nxp.com>; > >Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> > >Subject: [PATCH v4 21/22] ppc: qemu: Enable eTSEC support > > > >QEMU ppce500 target can dynamically instantiate an eTSEC device if "-device > >eTSEC" is given to QEMU. This commit enables eTSEC driver and the required > >fixed PHY driver to create a usable network configuration using eTSEC. > > > >Unlike a real world 85xx board that usually stores the eTSEC MAC address in > >an > >EEPROM, CONFIG_NET_RANDOM_ETHADDR is required for QEMU otherwise U- > >Boot ethernet initialization complains no valid ethernet address is set. > > > >Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> > >Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.olt...@nxp.com> > >--- > > > >(no changes since v1) > > > > configs/qemu-ppce500_defconfig | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > >diff --git a/configs/qemu-ppce500_defconfig b/configs/qemu-ppce500_defconfig > >index 151834b4cf..a1b9ea56ca 100644 > >--- a/configs/qemu-ppce500_defconfig > >+++ b/configs/qemu-ppce500_defconfig > >@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y > > CONFIG_OF_BOARD=y > > CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE=y > > CONFIG_SYS_RELOC_GD_ENV_ADDR=y > >+CONFIG_NET_RANDOM_ETHADDR=y > > CONFIG_DM=y > > CONFIG_SIMPLE_BUS_CORRECT_RANGE=y > > CONFIG_BLK=y > >@@ -35,8 +36,11 @@ CONFIG_MPC8XXX_GPIO=y CONFIG_DM_I2C=y > >CONFIG_SYS_I2C_FSL=y # CONFIG_MMC is not set > >+CONFIG_PHY_FIXED=y > > CONFIG_DM_ETH=y > >+CONFIG_DM_MDIO=y > > CONFIG_E1000=y > >+CONFIG_TSEC_ENET=y > > CONFIG_DM_PCI=y > > CONFIG_PCI_MPC85XX=y > > CONFIG_DM_RTC=y > >-- > >2.25.1 > > I tried integrating the series and was getting below error: > 2021-04-12T09:39:56.7536565Z FAILED > test/py/tests/test_efi_selftest.py::test_efi_selftest - u_boot_spawn.T... > 2021-04-12T09:39:56.7537048Z = 1 failed, 108 passed, 227 skipped, 1 > deselected, 3 warnings in 65.61s (0:01:05) = > > Details at > https://dev.azure.com/u-boot/a1096300-2999-4ec4-a21a-4c22075e3771/_apis/build/builds/2112/logs/251 > > I reverted this patch and it then build fine . > https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/pull/65
Did this fail more than once in that job? Sometimes due to I assume some race/etc, that test will fail from time to time. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
