On 4/9/21 8:05 AM, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
On 4/9/21 1:01 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 1:32 PM Patrice CHOTARD
<patrice.chot...@foss.st.com> wrote:
On 4/9/21 11:48 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 12:28 PM Patrice CHOTARD
<patrice.chot...@foss.st.com> wrote:
On 4/9/21 11:16 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 10:37 AM Patrice Chotard
<patrice.chot...@foss.st.com> wrote:
...
+ if (drv) {
+ if (drv == entry)
+ break;
+ } else {
+ if (!ret)
+ break;
+ }
This can be simplified to
} else if (!ret)
break;
I know but checkpatch.pl requested it ;-)
You mean it doesn't recognize 'else if' construction? Then it's a bug
there for sure.
No, i mean checkpath.pl request to put {} on all statements as shown below :
./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-cmd-bind-Fix-driver-binding-on-a-device.patch
CHECK: braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement
#83: FILE: drivers/core/lists.c:228:
+ if (drv) {
[...]
+ } else if (!ret)
So, you still can put else and if on one line, right?
No, if i put else and if on one line as you suggested, checkpatch.pl is
complaining as shown above.
Patrice
} else if (!ret) {
break;
}
?
