Dear Wolfgang Denk, >> <nitpick> >> it became illegal once u-boot for AT91 became required to be relocated >> </nitpick> > > No, it has always been illegal. You might thave been lucky that in > your case the erros did not show up erarlier, but this does not change > anything.
Sorry, before recently there was no relocation whatsoever used in u-boot for AT91 architectures. So there was no before/after relocation. The only complaint that can be put up is that someone introduced functions using static data called from code that in other architectures runs before relocation ;) Whatever, I am not an advocate for Atmel, neither am I getting paid by them, I am just a "user" that has to fix problems I did not expect to be there. For the fix, I see an ugly multiline #if defined(AT91SAM9260) || defined(AT91SAM9G20) || ... coming into arch/arm/asm/global_data.h. There is no common defined value for all AT91 SoCs that could be used. Will that be ok? Reinhard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
