Dear Simon.
In message <capnjgz3dmeaincecykjeturijqtmzhjidnyx_o4esre4gja...@mail.gmail.com>
you wrote:
>
> > > setexpr c *10 + *100
> >
> > I don't get it. The equivalent to "${a}${b}" would be
> >
> > setexpr c "*10*100"
> >
> > which is even simpler?
>
> I don't see how that works. The *10 thing in my example reads a string
> out of address 10.
Ah, got it. This requires your "[PATCH 10/10] setexpr: Add support
for strings" first...
But then... should there not be some '.s' size specification
somewhere?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
"Unix is simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity."
- Dennis Ritchie
